index

Jerry's Texas High School Football Ratings

High School College Pro

2003 Season www.TexasFootballRatings.com 2003 Season

2003 Preseason Class 1A Region 3 District Standings - ( Includes Overall and District Record Predictions, My Power rating, School’s Population, Preseason Regional, State and Overall Rankings, 2002 Overall and District record, Returning letterman, offensive and defensive starters, letterman lost) **Home field advantage is figured into the ratings for each week, so based on whether your team plays at home or away, might affect how your district record could end up even though you have a higher Preseason rating than another team.**

District 17	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Celeste	9 - 1	5 - 0	144.62	0	1	3	475	( 13-3 ) ( 5-0 )	( 10-6-5-9 )
Quinlan Boles Home	9 - 1	4 - 1	115.75	0	14	47	894	( 4-6 ) ( 3-2 )	( 20-9-9-2 )
Wolfe City	6 - 4	3 - 2	111.93	0	16	54	929	( 8-2 ) ( 4-1 )	( 13-5-5-9 )
Cumby	2 - 8	1 - 4	95.37	0	30	107	1060	( 2-8 ) ( 2-3 )	( 12-6-7-6 )
Dallas Rylie	3 - 7	1 - 4	92.84	0	31	112	1072	( 2-7 ) ( 1-4 )	( 11-9-4-2 )
Ladonia Fannindel	2 - 8	1 - 4	90.80	0	33	118	1079	( 0-9 ) ( 0-5 )	( 8-7-7-2 )
District 18	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Karnack	9 - 1	5 - 0	131.72	0	3	12	693	( 7-5 ) ( 4-1 )	( 9-9-9-6 )
Gilmer Union Hill	9 - 1	4 - 1	123.16	0	5	25	800	( 9-2 ) ( 4-1 )	( 24-6-9-6 )
Harleton	6 - 4	3 - 2	119.72	0	11	39	840	( 6-4 ) ( 4-1 )	( 12-6-7-9 )
Maud	6 - 4	2 - 3	96.94	0	27	99	1049	( 6-3 ) ( 2-3 )	( 14-6-6-10 )
Simms James Bowie	2 - 8	1 - 4	91.10	0	32	117	1078	( 1-9 ) ( 1-4 )	( 22-8-7-5 )
Detroit	0 - 10	0 - 5	86.23	0	36	131	1098	( 3-6 ) ( 0-5 )	( 3-3-3-10 )
District 20	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Joaquin	9 - 1	6 - 0	122.15	0	7	30	815	( 5-6 ) ( 5-1 )	( 23-8-8-10 )
Tenaha	7 - 3	5 - 1	122.95	0	6	27	802	( 10-2 ) ( 6-0 )	( 7-5-2-10 )
Mount Enterprise	4 - 6	4 - 2	112.76	0	15	51	919	( 3-7 ) ( 3-3 )	( 14-7-7-6 )
Beckville	3 - 7	3 - 3	99.67	0	24	88	1031	( 5-5 ) ( 4-2 )	( 7-4-4-10 )
Overton	3 - 7	2 - 4	96.92	0	28	100	1050	( 2-8 ) ( 1-5 )	( 15-7-6-8 )
Cushing	2 - 8	1 - 5	89.84	0	35	120	1083	( 1-9 ) ( 0-6 )	( 18-7-8-4 )
Price Carlisle	0 - 10	0 - 6	85.64	0	37	132	1099	( 2-8 ) ( 2-4 )	( 20-6-5-6 )
District 21	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Hubbard	7 - 3	6 - 0	122.12	0	8	31	816	( 9-2 ) ( 6-0 )	( 8-2-4-14 )
Wortham	7 - 3	5 - 1	121.73	0	9	32	818	( 4-7 ) ( 4-2 )	( 14-7-8-11 )
Itasca	4 - 6	4 - 2	104.67	0	21	74	1002	( 5-5 ) ( 4-2 )	( 10-5-5-12 )
Frost	5 - 5	3 - 3	101.70	0	23	81	1014	( 4-6 ) ( 2-4 )	( 10-3-3-6 )
Rice	3 - 7	2 - 4	103.14	0	22	77	1007	( 3-7 ) ( 2-4 )	( 14-9-9-5 )
Dawson	2 - 8	1 - 5	96.85	0	29	101	1051	( 7-3 ) ( 3-3 )	( 9-1-5-10 )
Covington	1 - 9	0 - 6	81.45	0	38	136	1103	( 1-9 ) ( 0-6 )	( 18-8-6-8 )
District 23	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Chilton	9 - 1	5 - 0	134.80	0	2	7	648	( 10-3 ) ( 5-0 )	( 16-7-7-13 )
Meridian	6 - 4	4 - 1	116.32	0	12	44	885	( 6-5 ) ( 3-2 )	( 15-6-6-7 )
Bosqueville	4 - 6	3 - 2	108.22	0	19	64	969	( 3-7 ) ( 3-2 )	( 21-8-8-6 )
Valley Mills	4 - 6	2 - 3	108.98	0	18	62	961	( 4-6 ) ( 3-2 )	( 13-6-7-7 )
Evant	3 - 7	1 - 4	97.43	0	26	96	1046	( 2-8 ) ( 0-5 )	( 16-9-9-4 )
Riesel	0 - 10	0 - 5	90.56	0	34	119	1080	( 1-9 ) ( 1-4 )	( 18-7-8-6 )
District 24	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Normangee	10 - 0	5 - 0	130.40	0	4	15	716	( 7-4 ) ( 4-1 )	( 18-8-8-4 )
Bremond	6 - 4	4 - 1	120.22	0	10	36	834	( 12-2 ) ( 5-0 )	( 5-2-2-16 )
Oakwood	8 - 2	3 - 2	115.99	0	13	46	892	( 8-2 ) ( 3-2 )	( 15-7-7-6 )
Lovelady	7 - 3	2 - 3	110.24	0	17	59	945	( 6-4 ) ( 2-3 )	( 11-6-6-5 )
Apple Springs	2 - 8	1 - 4	107.93	0	20	65	973	( 3-4 ) ( 1-4 )	( 18-10-10-3 )
Iola	1 - 9	0 - 5	97.84	0	25	94	1043	( 2-8 ) ( 0-5 )	( 15-8-8-3 )