index

Jerry's Texas High School Football Ratings

High School College Pro

2003 Season www.TexasFootballRatings.com 2003 Season

2003 Preseason Class 5A Region 1 District Standings - ( Includes Overall and District Record Predictions, My Power rating, School’s Population, Preseason Regional, State and Overall Rankings, 2002 Overall and District record, Returning letterman, offensive and defensive starters, letterman lost) **Home field advantage is figured into the ratings for each week, so based on whether your team plays at home or away, might affect how your district record could end up even though you have a higher Preseason rating than another team.**

District 1	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
EP Franklin	10 - 0	8 - 0	183.62	2565	10	40	51	( 10-1 ) ( 8-0 )	( 20-6-5-23 )
EP/S Montwood	7 - 2	7 - 1	160.07	2695	37	135	259	( 5-5 ) ( 5-3 )	( 21-4-5-34 )
EP Andress	8 - 2	6 - 2	160.99	1976	34	130	243	( 4-6 ) ( 3-5 )	( 17-4-5-16 )
EP/Y Hanks	7 - 3	5 - 3	159.32	2545	38	141	270	( 5-5 ) ( 3-5 )	( 21-5-5-26 )
EP/S Socorro	6 - 4	4 - 4	161.08	2658	33	129	241	( 9-2 ) ( 7-1 )	( 17-5-5-25 )
EP/Y Bel Air	4 - 6	3 - 5	153.18	2254	43	161	333	( 4-6 ) ( 3-5 )	( 22-6-8-21 )
EP/Y Americas	3 - 7	2 - 6	145.20	2476	48	195	466	( 2-8 ) ( 1-7 )	( 14-4-4-17 )
EP/Y Eastwood	3 - 7	1 - 7	139.50	2115	56	218	563	( 3-7 ) ( 2-6 )	( 17-3-4-20 )
EP Coronado	2 - 8	0 - 8	140.11	2500	54	214	548	( 4-6 ) ( 4-4 )	( 14-3-3-26 )
District 2	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Lubbock Monterey	9 - 1	5 - 0	183.92	2284	8	38	49	( 7-6 ) ( 5-0 )	( 15-1-2-40 )
Amarillo	9 - 1	4 - 1	175.62	2172	18	73	101	( 5-6 ) ( 3-2 )	( 18-4-7-30 )
Lubbock Coronado	4 - 6	3 - 2	165.20	2351	30	117	198	( 6-6 ) ( 4-1 )	( 30-5-2-34 )
S.Ang. Central	3 - 7	2 - 3	155.57	3411	41	154	309	( 2-8 ) ( 1-4 )	( 26-3-6-22 )
Lubbock	4 - 6	1 - 4	148.11	2441	44	180	413	( 4-6 ) ( 2-3 )	( 16-2-3-25 )
Amarillo Tascosa	3 - 7	0 - 5	143.09	2180	50	202	501	( 2-8 ) ( 0-5 )	( 24-7-4-20 )
District 3	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Midland Lee	9 - 0	5 - 0	185.99	3095	7	32	40	( 4-5 ) ( 2-3 )	( 28-9-5-21 )
Abilene	8 - 2	4 - 1	186.09	2471	6	31	39	( 10-2 ) ( 4-1 )	( 29-3-6-28 )
Abilene Cooper	6 - 4	3 - 2	180.96	2280	13	51	64	( 12-1 ) ( 5-0 )	( 22-4-5-35 )
Odessa Permian	3 - 7	2 - 3	170.70	3553	25	92	140	( 5-5 ) ( 1-4 )	( 39-5-9-31 )
Midland	4 - 6	1 - 4	168.21	2581	27	107	166	( 12-3 ) ( 3-2 )	( 17-2-0-50 )
Odessa	1 - 9	0 - 5	140.04	4043	55	215	551	( 4-6 ) ( 0-5 )	( 14-4-2-45 )
District 4	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
DeSoto	8 - 2	6 - 0	192.45	2131	2	12	13	( 6-5 ) ( 5-1 )	( 21-9-5-31 )
Duncanville	9 - 1	5 - 1	183.82	3471	9	39	50	( 8-3 ) ( 6-0 )	( 24-5-5-43 )
Mansfield Summit	8 - 2	4 - 2	176.97	2456	16	69	93	( 5-5 ) ( 2-4 )	( 50-11-10-10 )
Burleson	4 - 6	3 - 3	166.01	1954	29	115	190	( 6-5 ) ( 4-2 )	( 17-6-5-30 )
Cedar Hill	4 - 6	2 - 4	159.04	2065	39	143	274	( 2-8 ) ( 0-6 )	( 38-7-8-20 )
Weatherford	3 - 7	1 - 5	160.25	2087	36	133	255	( 5-5 ) ( 3-3 )	( 20-6-6-25 )
Mansfield	0 - 10	0 - 6	142.25	2608	52	206	510	( 2-8 ) ( 1-5 )	( 18-2-4-22 )
District 5	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
HEB Euless Trinity	10 - 0	7 - 0	191.43	2920	3	16	18	( 9-2 ) ( 7-0 )	( 28-3-5-26 )
Colleyville Heritage	7 - 3	6 - 1	178.07	2199	14	60	83	( 9-2 ) ( 6-1 )	( 15-3-4-35 )
HEB Hurst Bell	8 - 2	5 - 2	173.53	2778	21	79	115	( 6-5 ) ( 5-2 )	( 22-5-6-37 )
Keller	5 - 5	4 - 3	167.47	2295	28	109	174	( 5-5 ) ( 3-4 )	( 17-6-4-18 )
Grapevine	5 - 5	3 - 4	169.99	2044	26	96	145	( 5-5 ) ( 3-4 )	( 21-6-7-23 )
FW/Sag. Boswell	4 - 6	2 - 5	160.51	2005	35	132	248	( 1-9 ) ( 1-6 )	( 17-8-7-20 )
Keller Fossil Ridge	3 - 7	1 - 6	155.49	2585	42	155	310	( 3-7 ) ( 3-4 )	( 12-5-7-31 )
FW/Bdv. Haltom	2 - 8	0 - 7	146.13	2376	47	192	452	( 1-9 ) ( 0-7 )	( 26-7-5-20 )
District 6	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Arlington Lamar	8 - 2	5 - 0	189.49	2916	4	20	24	( 11-2 ) ( 4-1 )	( 41-2-4-48 )
Arl. Sam Houston	6 - 4	4 - 1	174.07	2827	20	78	112	( 6-6 ) ( 3-2 )	( 18-4-4-25 )
Arlington	7 - 3	3 - 2	176.66	2841	17	70	94	( 12-2 ) ( 5-0 )	( 25-2-3-29 )
Arlington Martin	4 - 6	2 - 3	162.26	3513	32	127	228	( 2-8 ) ( 1-4 )	( 30-7-5-26 )
FW Paschal	3 - 7	1 - 4	146.74	2097	45	188	442	( 2-8 ) ( 1-4 )	( 18-6-6-10 )
Arlington Bowie	0 - 10	0 - 5	142.49	3151	51	205	506	( 3-7 ) ( 1-4 )	( 26-4-4-38 )
District 7	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Southlake Carroll	10 - 0	5 - 0	195.32	1986	1	6	6	( 16-0 ) ( 5-0 )	( 27-5-3-36 )
Lew. The Colony	8 - 2	4 - 1	181.17	1967	12	49	62	( 5-6 ) ( 3-2 )	( 20-7-6-22 )
Coppell	6 - 4	3 - 2	177.48	2574	15	64	88	( 8-4 ) ( 4-1 )	( 28-5-5-36 )
Lewisville	3 - 7	2 - 3	170.90	3007	23	88	134	( 4-6 ) ( 2-3 )	( 18-6-5-11 )
Lew. Flower Mound	1 - 9	1 - 4	146.59	2335	46	189	445	( 3-7 ) ( 0-5 )	( 21-8-4-33 )
Lew./FM Marcus	0 - 10	0 - 5	141.66	2434	53	209	523	( 3-7 ) ( 1-4 )	( 18-2-5-38 )
District 8	Rec	Dist	Rating	Pop	Reg	ST	ALL	2002 Record	(RL-OS-DS-LL)
Irving	9 - 1	7 - 0	189.15	2517	5	22	25	( 7-4 ) ( 6-1 )	( 38-9-7-21 )
Grand Prairie	8 - 2	6 - 1	181.59	2737	11	47	60	( 3-7 ) ( 3-4 )	( 24-7-5-10 )
Irving MacArthur	8 - 2	5 - 2	174.96	2277	19	75	107	( 7-4 ) ( 5-2 )	( 35-5-6-27 )
Irving Nimitz	4 - 6	4 - 3	171.25	2152	22	84	129	( 9-3 ) ( 6-1 )	( 20-4-4-24 )
Carr. Turner	6 - 4	3 - 4	170.73	2217	24	91	139	( 6-4 ) ( 3-4 )	( 18-7-7-24 )
Carr. Creekview	3 - 7	2 - 5	164.58	2362	31	120	205	( 3-7 ) ( 2-5 )	( 20-5-7-24 )
So. Grand Prairie	1 - 9	1 - 6	157.01	2565	40	151	302	( 5-5 ) ( 3-4 )	( 13-3-4-17 )
Carr. Nwmn Smith	1 - 9	0 - 7	143.65	2207	49	199	490	( 2-8 ) ( 0-7 )	( 21-7-5-19 )